Open trading research lab · 5,815 eligible sized candidates
Test trading ideas.See where they fail after costs.
Current finding: Our average trade lost after costs.
TradeClaw is an open trading research lab. Across 5,815 eligible sized candidates, average modeled net expectancy was negative after stated fee and slippage assumptions. Inspect every result, test your own idea, or self-host the complete evidence trail.
- Self-hosted
- MIT licensed
- Open data
R = the amount planned to risk on one trade.
Calculation methodology- Before modeled costs, per trade
- -0.01R
- − Modeled fees + slippage, per trade
- 0.55R
- ≈ 0.187% of trade size
- = After modeled costs, per trade
- -0.56R
- Separate simulation: compounded result (1% risk per trade)
- -100%
Follow the evidence
From finding to reproduction.
Start with what happened, understand the cost assumptions, test a variation, then reproduce the work yourself.
- 01 · FindingSee the recordStart with the cost-adjusted result, including the result that failed.
- 02 · CostsUnderstand the dragSee how fees, slippage, and turnover change the apparent edge.
- 03 · EvidenceInspect the studiesCompare observed records with separately labeled modeled research.
- 04 · TestTest an ideaChange the market, range, and method before reading the metrics.
- 05 · ReproduceSelf-host the labRun the same code, database, and evidence trail on your own machine.